This section contains various personal opinions that surround my position as Fire Commissioner. Its important for the people who I represent to know where I stand on particular district issues.  
 
 
2009 Budget Thoughts
The budget process is always a long and critical one - on a personal note, I find it particularly challenging when I have to make a decision to cut funds to deny a particular worthy request - but that's the balancing act that I strongly believe the Commissioners must play - even when its unpopular.

I wanted to share some preliminary thoughts on what I would like to focus on for next year's budget.
  1. Generator service contracts: the fire district is committed to installing generators in each firehouse - and they all come with a heavy (but worth it) price tag. We really should be focused on protecting these investiments by getting annual service contracts. Furthermore, as emergency generators - we should really be ensuring that they are maintained so that they do work when they are needed. We discussed this idea in yesterday's workshop, so I will know more about costs in the following week or so.
  2. Maintenance Personnel: some Commissioners have suggested that we get a maintenance person(s) and have them available to fix the variety of maintenance issues that we have in the district. Certainly that as these buildings age and get used more frequently, they will require more maintenance to maintain them - that's not a far fetched concept to grasp. I don't however see this coming with a small price tag, so its something that we will have to balance
  3. Access System Finalization: part of the access system initiative this year was to continue with installing interior doors at various locations throughout the fire district facilities and to enable the system for remote configuration (via internet). Next year should mark the last of the installs - hopefully completing the access system initiative. In addition, there have been some suggestions of hooking the system to our siren/pagers to have it automatically unlock doors when we get a call, etc. This has already been discussed with the security company, and its a very inexpensive option that I believe we should explore.
  4. Equipment Reserve Savings: it's clear that the ladder situation is indeed an important one to the fire district, and a costly one to the taxpayers. We have already seen that had we purchased the trucks two years ago - we would have saved over $100,000, but that is water under the bridge. The Board is now looking at consultants to determine what our ladder truck requirements actually are, and so I'll speak more about that when their report is finalized. That being said, we know that the cost to purchase a new ladder is going to be substantial, so we should try and shift as much money as possible into the Equipment Reserve in preparation for this purchase.
  5. Software Initiative: we are currently evaluating software to streamline ALL of the paperwork processes in the GFD, something that will save our personnel and firefighters countless hours. Depending on where this evaluation goes will determine additional costs, so in the next couple of months I'll know more about what will be required for this initiative - but this is a very important initiative (and one long time coming).
The trick now becomes how achieve the above goals (hopefully all) without raising taxes (and I have some ideas on that, but those require a lot more thought).

Some have argued that it is negligent if we don't raise taxes at least a 4% standard raise - because what happens is if we don't, we end up having to raise taxes a significant amount a few years later to make up for that difference. And as I have discussed in the past, this is precisely the predicament the GFD found it self in a few years ago when I first became a commissioner.

I'm not necessarily disagreeing with that argument, but I think we can do much more with the current budget before coming to the conclusion of raising taxes. That being said, we may have no choice but to raise taxes even after restructuring line items and moving funds around. But we'll see what happens after the Board works numbers out...
posted by spackmann in Opinions at 12:14 PM (72 day(s) old)
0 comments | 0 trackbacks | permalink | print-friendly version


 
I Wish You Knew
I found this on a firefighter's myspace, and I think it really does an excellent job of what we as firefighters have to contend with. A lot of people probably associate the hazards of firefighting with the typical toxic chemicals, fire, dangerous scenes (vehicle, northway), etc. Few probably associate the hazards us firefighters face with the emotional burdens they present - such is the case with the following passage.

Think about the passage the next time you see a blue-light flashing by your home or up the road.

It is entitled "I Wish you knew":
What I wish people knew about EMS, Firefighters, Dispatchers, & Law Enforcement.

I wish you could know what it is like to search a burning bedroom for trapped children at 3 AM, flames rolling above your head, your palms and knees burning as you crawl, the floor sagging under your weight as the kitchen below you burns.

I wish you could comprehend a husband's horror at 6 in the morning as I check his wife of 40 years for a pulse and find none. I start CPR anyway, hoping to bring her back, knowing intuitively it is too late. But wanting her husband and family to know everything possible was done to try to save her life.

I wish you knew the unique smell of burning insulation, the taste of soot-filled mucus, the feeling of intense heat through your turnout gear, the sound of flames crackling, the eeriness of being able to see absolutely nothing in dense smoke-sensations that I've become too familiar with.

I wish you could read my mind as I respond to a building fire "Is this a false alarm or a working fire? How is the building Constructed? What hazards await me? Is anyone trapped?" Or to call, "What is wrong with the patient? Is it minor or life-threatening? Is the caller really in distress or is he waiting for us with a 2x4 or a gun?"

I wish you could be in the emergency room as a doctor pronounces dead the beautiful five-year old girl that I have been trying to save during the past 25 minutes, who will never go on her first date or say the words, "I love you Mommy" again.

I wish you could know the frustration I feel in the cab of the engine or unit the driver with his foot pressing down hard on the pedal, my arm tugging again and again at the air horn chain, as you fail to yield the right-of-way at an intersection or in traffic. When you need us however, your first comment upon our arrival will be, "It took you forever to get here!"

I wish you could know my thoughts as I help extricate a girl of teenage years from the remains of her automobile. "What if this was my daughter, sister, my girlfriend or a friend? What is her parent's reaction going to be when they open the door to find a police officer with hat in hand?"

I wish you could know how it feels to walk in the back door and greet my parents and family, not having the heart to tell them that I nearly did not come back from the last call.

I wish you could know how it feels dispatching officers, firefighters and EMT's out and when we call for them and our heart drops because no one answers back or to here a bone chilling 911 call of a child or wife needing assistance.

I wish you could feel the hurt as people verbally, and sometimes physically, abuse us or belittle what I do, or as they express their attitudes of "It will never happen to me."

I wish you could realize the physical, emotional and mental drain or missed meals, lost sleep and forgone social activities, in addition to all the tragedy my eyes have seen.

I wish you could know the brotherhood and self-satisfaction of helping save a life or preserving someone's property, or being able to be there in time of crisis, or creating order from total chaos.

I wish you could understand what it feels like to have a little boy tugging at your arm and asking, "Is Mommy okay?" Not even being able to look in his eyes without tears from your own and not knowing what to say.

Or to have to hold back a long time friend who watches his buddy having CPR done on him as you take him away in the Medic Unit. You know all along he did not have his seat belt on. A sensation that I have become too familiar with.

Unless you have lived with this kind of life, you will never truly understand or appreciate who I am, we are, or what our job really means to us...

I wish you could though.
posted by spackmann in Opinions at 2:43 PM (660 day(s) old)
0 comments | 0 trackbacks | permalink | print-friendly version


 
Absentee Ballots
There have been many comments regarding the idea of absentee ballots in the Greenfield Fire District.

The idea surfaced during the latest ladder truck initiative surrounding the elder population of Prestwick Chase. Let me assure you that when this was brought to the Board of Fire Commissioner's attention (this was not the first time the idea of absentee ballots has been discussed in the fire district), it was given the appropriate amount of respect and consideration. Some propaganda surrounding the ladder truck initiative suggested that the board simply disregarded the request - I can assure you nothing could be further from the truth. Others suggested that the idea was simply dismissed - but that is simply wrong.

Unfortunately, I personally cannot support an initiative to allow absentee ballots for fire district elections at the present time. Section 175-b of NYS Town Law describes a myriad of procedures that the fire district must perform to allow absentee ballots. I believe the various requirements would create a serious logistical strain on our resources. To put it bluntly, I do not believe the fire district has adequate resources to adhere to the "letter of the law" and thus fulfill the many responsibilities surrounding absentee ballots. Also note that Section 175-b also outlines that the Board may elect to have absentee ballots, but is not required to do so by state law.

Secondly, I want to go on record as saying that I am extremely sensitive to the resident's of Prestwick Chase unique situation. I understand that transportation is limited and they need adequate head notice to secure transportation for a given event. With that said, I believe a suitable compromise would be provide you with adequate notices of these events to allow the needed time to secure transportation. I have also spoken with other town residents in similar situations as yours, and they suggested that we lengthen the ballot hours from the standard six to nine at night. For example, having early afternoon ballot hours may provide additional transportation opportunities - so I believe this is a reasonable compromise that the board should consider.

I have opened communication with residents of Prestwick Chase, and try to address their concerns.

I believe that most of these issues can be solved through communication, which can be seriously improved in this fire district. To help address this problem, I have begun working on a comprehensive communication plan alongside the Board of Fire Commissioners - and I'll post more about this initiative later.
posted by spackmann in Opinions at 8:45 AM (704 day(s) old)
0 comments | 0 trackbacks | permalink | print-friendly version


 
Questions and Answers from Ladder Truck Informational Meeting
I tried to collect what I believed to be some of the more important questions that were discussed during the public informational meeting last Tuesday.

The questions are in quotes and italic print and the answers directly follow them. I pulled these questions from notes I took and from memory, so they aren't direct quotes, but fair representations of what was said.
  1. "I know that this fire district currently has zero debt - no bonds, no leases. I would hate to see this district start down that trend; there is no question that these trucks aren't needed - I personally believe there is a clear need for them, but I do not see how you can justify putting this district down the 'wrong side' of the road by borrowing money to acquire these trucks."

    I share this exact concern - I agree with it one hundred percent. In fact, the Greenfield Fire District is one of the only fire districts in the state that is debt free. This is becoming more and more of a rarity this day and age. From a fiscally responsible point of view, I love the concept of being debt free.

    That being said however, I strongly believe that buying these trucks now, rather than later, will SAVE TAXPAYER MONEY, and that borrowing the money to buy them - while incurring a small amount of debt - is FAR superior of a choice compared to waiting and saving up the money, and buying the trucks at a later date.

    In 2001, a quote for a ladder truck was in the neighborhood of $600,000. As of this month, the district received a quote for $800,000 for the ladder truck to replace the current one housed in the Maple Avenue Fire Department. That works out to be approximately $40,000 per year. If it takes another four years to save up money to buy the replacement for Maple Avenue's, and then another three/four years after that to buy Greenfield Center a ladder truck - then you are looking at around 12 years of savings - meaning that you could expect to pay approximately $500,000 more than their current prices.

    And that's not counting the additional costs of the 2007 EPA requirements and the costly repairs that need to go into Maple Avenue's truck to keep it in-service while we save up the money.

    We can side-step all of these three sizeable costs by being proactive and purchasing these trucks now - it will save money in the long term.
  2. "How many times do these specialty pieces get used - if not that often, I don't understand why you need new ones?"

    While its true that the Greenfield Fire District doesn't have many fires per year (this is a trend consistent across the nation not just Greenfield Fire District), it only takes one fire (and the district has a lot more than one a year) for someone to get hurt - or worse yet, killed.

    As an elected official, I can tell you with supreme confidence that I hope these and all the current trucks NEVER get used. If they do get used, that means they are being dispatched to an emergency - which means that someone might lose their home, their property, their livelihood, pets or worse yet - loved ones. That is not something that any volunteer in the Greenfield Fire District wants to see happen.

    So to me it's not a relevant question as to how often these trucks are used - I think it's more relevant to look at them as an "insurance policy" analogy. As another Commissioner suggested to me, you can view these ladder trucks from the same perspective as most people view health insurance. Health insurance is becoming more and more costly, and people don't like to pay for it. The first time however that you have a serious medical situation; you will be thanking yourself many times for having health insurance in place.

    The same can be said about these ladder trucks, you hope you never have to use them (and the same goes for every other truck in the Greenfield Fire District) - but that one time when you need to, you are going to be very glad that you have them protecting you.

    I also feel the need to point out the entire focus on finances here - and I agree that finances are a very important concern surrounding this initiative, but there are many other significant issues that I do not want to be dwarfed by focusing on the financial side.

    There are many issues, that I refer to as "intangibles," that you can't quite quantify with numbers - and those are the safety concerns of operating equipment we know is in danger of failing, and also the performance expectations we place on these trucks.

    When we place three firefighters 100 feet into the air, the last thing that we want is for there to be a problem with the truck that could put our firefighters safety in jeopardy.

    Additionally, we expect these trucks to perform the way they are designed and anticipated to perform at a moment's notice. Many devastating scenarios can be envisioned where a ladder trucks shows up to a fire - and then breaks down completely, effectively providing no fire suppression. These are two examples that no one wants to see become a reality and are both reasons enough to replace the current ladder truck at Maple Avenue and acquire a new ladder truck for Greenfield Center.
  3. "I thought everything was financially fine and now I hear that the district had a lack of planning over the years and now has major financial hurdles to address. If the board made these fiscal oversights and, as a result, now has these numerous financial challenges, what provisions is the board currently taking to plan for the future and address them?"

    First and foremost, I want to make it very clear that my predecessors were negligent in forecasting the replacement of Maple Avenue's ladder (and thus did not budget to do so), that does NOT imply that the Board is not conscious of the financial hurdles and is not taking steps now to correct them - that's what this ladder initiative is all about!

    One of the reasons the Board is endorsing this initiative is because by being proactive, we can save money, and allow us to address other financial hurdles:
    • In Spring of 2006, the Board of Fire Commissioners hired an engineering firm to survey the Porter Corners fire station. Initial reports suggest that one side of the foundation is sinking. The floor has been jacked and leveled twice since it was built 16 years ago - so the initial report does correlate with previous repairs.

      The current Porter Corners station life expectancy is 20 - 30 years, which means that in another four years - it could be coming up on its life expectancy. Obviously the cost of replacing the station depends on many factors - but to help judge we can look at the latest fire station to be built in the county. The Arvin Hart fire station was built this year and has a similar square footage to Porter Corners. According to the Stillwater website, their station cost 2.1 million dollars.

      Obviously a cost of that magnitude needs to planned for, and in order to minimize the impact to the taxpayers, we need to start saving up for that expense now.
    • Part of the engineering survey also included the improperly designed Greenfield Center's roof. Part of the initial solutions involve replacing the roof with a new pitch - this could cost in the neighborhood of $200,000 - so this too must be planned financially.
  4. "I believe that everything is growing out of control, last year your district got a pension plan, now you are going out to buy ladder trucks - it seems to me that you should be looking at consolidating firehouses, perhaps closing one of them to save costs. Additionally, I have a concern that you are growing out of control - if you look at what is going on in Wilton and Corinth - those firehouses are gigantic slap-in-the-face's to the taxpayers; and I do not want to see that happen here."

    Every Commissioner that sits on the Board is a taxpayer - and each Commissioner knows all too well the concerns about taxes - and share many concerns raised regarding the tax rate. However, I strongly believe that the budget is BY NO MEANS out of control.

    The data provided by the county includes the tax rate and budgets for all the fire districts in Saratoga County - as you'll see, our budget and tax rates are on par with comparable fire districts. When you take into consideration the facts that the Greenfield Fire District is the most active (responds to the most calls) volunteer fire district in the County, and the largest geographically in the county and has four firehouses and 17 pieces of apparatus (compared to one or two stations and FAR fewer trucks), you see that our budget is extremely conservative compared to the size of this district.

    I am, respectfully, slightly insulted by the implication that we are spending money in a haphazardly or outlandish, frivolous manner. I challenge any taxpayer to fine anywhere in our budget anything that is "fluff" or otherwise extravagant.
  5. "I believe that communication is a major issue not only in the fire district, but in the town as a whole - you are arguably just getting caught up in the many communication issues of the Planning Board, Zoning Board, Town Board and others - so you are not alone. I think you need to seriously work on the communication between the residents and the fire district - I know that you are simply 'covering your butts' with the legal notices, but no one reads those."

    I agree whole-heartedly with the concern about communication between taxpayers and their governments- the fire district is no exception. But I do believe that there is a misconception that there hasn't been proper advertising. Indeed, the Board of Fire Commissioners has gone "above and beyond" what we are required to by law.
    • there have been approximately 6 newspaper articles, not just legal notices. These articles have appeared in three different newspapers: Saratogian, Gazette and Times Union.
    • Each firehouse sign has - at a minimum - of one week for important information to be posted such as the ladder truck referendum.
    • The Board of Fire Commissioners now post all legal notices (enlarged to be easy to read) in town halls for residents to view.
    • We mail all minutes to each town supervisor each month
    • All supervisors are informed of any major event in the fire district either via email or via a personal meeting (usually both)
    • We have allocated funds next year to construct a district website to post minutes of each meeting and budget information
    • The Board is also discussing the idea of having regularly scheduled informational meetings - perhaps biannually with no specific agenda other than to inform the public of current fire district initiatives and to have a Q/A session
    • We have also discussed the idea of having monthly articles in the Penny-Saver, as it is a widely distributed newspaper in the Town of Greenfield, starting next year.
    So as you can see, the Board of Fire Commissioners is very much interested about addressing the "communication" concern voiced by many residents.
Any questions, just let me know.
posted by spackmann in Opinions at 1:45 PM (741 day(s) old)
0 comments | 0 trackbacks | permalink | print-friendly version


 
Point System Morale
We had a wonderful public workshop to discuss the point system percentages - and I am very relieved that we were able to clear up MANY misconceptions about the program.

I do feel somewhat responsible for these misconceptions - after all, it is the commissioners responsibility to educate our members about district initiatives - and I feel as though many of our commissioners including myself could have done a much better job doing so. Unfortunately even some commissioners weren't entirely understanding the point system - which is simply inexcusable at this stage.

There were many hand outs that outlined the point system (officially called the LOSAP program) handed out during the two public meetings last year - but unfortunately there was a serious lack of member presence there. I was personally disappointed at the lack of members who attended those informational meetings - clearly those could have cleared up some of the misconceptions that existed up to this point.

Be that as it may, the commissioners probably could have done a better job of educating the point system over the past year. I want to extend an open invitation to any member to give me a call anytime they have a question regarding the point system - this of course goes for any other concern that they may have, whether it be related to the point system or not. This should go without saying, but I wanted to make that explicitly clear.

I think a more serious issue arose Thursday evening, and that was of district moral. I heard from many members that its is simply unfair to treat one company differently from another - and as we explored that issue, we uncovered something that I perceive to be VERY serious.

I can not correct mistakes in the past - I have commented on this MANY times before. I really do believe that company memberships raising funds to purchase firefighting equipment is SIMPLY WRONG. I can't phrase that any other way - the four wheel ATV purchased by the Porter Corners membership and Auxiliary is a great benefit to the district - and since it is a tool used to benefit the district - the district should have paid for it.

IF EQUIPMENT IS NEEDED TO PERFORM OUR JOB, WHICH IS FIREFIGHTING, THEN THE DISTRICT SHOULD PURCHASE IT - NOT A FIRE COMPANY'S MEMBERSHIP

There is no other way to look at it. I was questioned on whether or not the district should reimburse the company for the ATV, I am forced to say no. The fact is, as I explained that evening, that there have been MANY examples of each company purchasing equipment, and that it is simply financially impossible to reimburse every company for these purchases - it would be a tremendous expense, and our district has serious budgetary hurdles to address. I have commented on this issue many times on my website as well.

But the real issue here is that members feel they are being treated unfairly - I spoke to the commissioners about this after the workshop. I can not express how much of a concern this is of mine - EVERY COMPANY SHOULD FEEL THAT THEY ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THIS DISTRICT, that is simply not true. The fact that some feel this way is a serious issue that the commissioners need to address.

One of the issues that was raised during the workshop was that of allotments - I was not a commissioner then, but apparently when the commissioners revamped the allotments, it caused quite the morale issue throughout the district.

I don't have the actual break down of the dollar amounts for the allotments (handy at the moment), but it was explained that when they were divided up based on calls, and that actually took money away from the companies that run fewer calls - which is obviously where the bad feelings come from.

I also spoke about this with the commissioners after the meeting, and I will endeavor to look at this come budget time this year.

Some members suggested that everyone should be treated equally, and even went so far as to suggest everyone should have the same number of trucks, etc - and while that might solve the morale issue - it simply isn't possible. It's not practical and it's unrealistic - each company has its own unique needs - and those differ between companies. Simply put, the "treat everyone the same" rule does work in most cases, but as a general rule it does NOT work. What is necessary and IMPORTANT is that each company get treated fairly - that's the real issue here, and without question there were members in attendance who believe they weren't being treated fairly.

It is because of this that I will support the 10% across the board initiative - I truly do believe that this is not fair to the taxpayer - but its also important to the taxpayer to have a solid district morale to depend on. I do believe that the 10%/12%/15%/15% option is really the only fair way to go for the taxpayer - I sincerely believe that, and nothing discussed during Thursday's workshop proved otherwise - but the district morale issue is too significant to overlook. I find this to be a very important issue that the Board of Fire Commissioners must address as we move forward.

It also occurs to me that there's maybe a little bit of history that is playing a part in all of this. The mistakes of the past - are in the PAST, and we must turn over a new page and start new now, and make sure that we don't repeat these mistakes as we move forward. I realize that some members have many examples of how a company has been mistreated over the years - but I want you to seriously show me any examples of being mistreated over the past year.

In fact, in asking that same question - I couldn't get an answer, and there's a reason for that, the Board of Fire Commissioners has changed DRASTICALLY, and I would like to think that all the issues that occured all to frequently in the past are FAR behind us - but we also need the membership to take that leap of faith along with us - leave the past in the past, and let's move this district into the future together as a team.
posted by spackmann in Opinions at 2:28 AM (863 day(s) old)
0 comments | 0 trackbacks | permalink | print-friendly version


 
The Evil "Downsizing" Word
In a meeting to discuss leasing options for EL-293 and Greenfield Center's next ladder, a brief - and I stress brief discussion arose involving the possibility of replacing ETA-282 and TA-283 with a new six-man ETA. I was not present during that meeting - I had a gear committee meeting with Morning Pride - but I was told that it was just passing conversation and nothing more.

I am amazed at how quickly these short conversations not only disburse throughout the membership, but how quickly then can metamorph into another animal. I was asked a day later why the commissioners were going to "downsize" Middle Grove and why they did not seem it necessary to contact the officers before making this decision.

I have commented before about the dangers rumors pose to district moral - and this is a great example. A four-second discussion got morphed into a solidified plan to "downsize" (there's that bad word again) Middle Grove - all without one conversation with the officers of the district and in particular, the officers from Middle Grove.

Rest assured, that if there were plans to do this, the officers WILL be contacted. What I am more concerned about is the use of the word "downsizing" - it has such a negative connotation.

What I am trying to show is that there are really two ways of looking at a given situation - the negative spin, or the positive spin - and using words like "downsizing" certainly falls into the negative category.

I believe that the idea of replacing ETA-282 and TA-283 with a new six-man cab 3k tanker is a valid one - it warrants consideration. Using words like "downsizing" does nothing but put a negative spin on this idea. The appropriate way of looking at this would be to consider the positives - i.e. what the company (or the district) will be gaining. The reality is that you will be getting rid of an older ETA-282 and an under utilized TA-283 (it does not have a six man cab) and Middle Grove will be obtaining a modern and better equiped piece of apparatus - to me, there is nothing negative about this deal. Furthermore, with the now free bay - the ability to add a MED vehicle is now a possibility - something that has been discussed over the last six months.

Now that this passing conversation has now turned into more of a serious discussion, I hope the Middle Grove membership gives the idea some serious consideration - I believe it is beneficial to the company and is certainly fair.
posted by spackmann in Opinions at 10:13 PM (865 day(s) old)
0 comments | 0 trackbacks | permalink | print-friendly version


 
September 2008
Sun  Mon  Tue  Wed  Thu  Fri  Sat 
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    
       
<  Aug Sep Oct  >
 Search This Blog
Enter your search terms below and click the magnifying glass to search.
Advanced Search Page
 Contact Info
AOL Instant Messenger
RSpackmann
Email Richard Spackmann
More Contact Info
 Recent Postings
The Point System Myths and Facts (Tue, Apr 25)
Discussion about Chief's Vehicle (Mon, Apr 24)
Light Duty Policy (Tue, Mar 21)
Collapse Zones of Buildings (Sat, Dec 31)
Why to Wear a Uniform While "On-Duty" (Fri, Dec 30)
Report: Majority of Fire Departments Nationwide Fail to Meet Response Time Standards (Thu, Jan 13)
Town Height Restrictions (Sat, Jul 16)
Traffic Concerns in Town of Wilton (Tue, Feb 08)
Some Advice from an SEC Commissioner (Wed, Mar 16)
Show All September Entries
 Blog Archives
 Blog Categories
Select from the following blog categories below. This will display only the entries in the category you select.
 
 Blog Statistics
Posts in September: 0
Most Active Time Period:
   6:00 - 8:59 Eastern (GMT-4)
Average Posts/Month: 13
Average Words/Post: 223
Total Blog Posts: 569
Total Categories: 0
 
 News Feeds
The term "feed" is used to denote the information presented here in a different format. In this case, there are multiple formats to choose from: XML, RSS, RDF and ATOM. Click the images below to download campaign news in the specified format. For additional information about news feeds can be found here.
These feeds are viewable by a number of free programs such as Feedster and Pluck. For a commercial option I recommend using News Gator.
 About This Blog
This campaign blog is powered by the Blojsom open source project.
Visit the BLOJSOM homepage
 Disclaimer
The views expressed here are those of myself and not my employer. Nothing contained herein is representative of the Maple Avenue Fire Department or the Greenfield Fire District. For a more complete disclaimer click here.
This site uses Cascading Style Sheets
This site uses XHTML
Get the Firefox browser
Powered by RedHat Linux
Powered by Java!
Powered by MySql!
Visit Blogarama, the Blog Directory
Visitors to RichardSpackmann.com since December 10th 2005